Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Volume rendering techniques for scientific visualization have increasingly transitioned toward Monte Carlo (MC) methods in recent years due to their flexibility and robustness. However, their application in multi-channel visualization remains underexplored. Traditional compositing-based approaches often employ arbitrary color blending functions, which lack a physical basis and can obscure data interpretation. We introduce multi-density Woodcock tracking, a simple and flexible extension of Woodcock tracking for multi-channel volume rendering that leverages the strengths of Monte Carlo methods to generate high-fidelity visuals. Our method offers a physically grounded solution for inter-channel color blending and eliminates the need for arbitrary blending functions. We also propose a unified blending modality by generalizing Woodcock's distance tracking method, facilitating seamless integration of alternative blending functions from prior works. Through evaluation across diverse datasets, we demonstrate that our approach maintains real-time interactivity while achieving high-quality visuals by accumulating frames over time. Alper Sahistan, Stefan Zellmann, Nate Morrical, Valerio Pascucci, and Ingo Waldmore » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available January 1, 2026
-
null (Ed.)The term “in situ processing” has evolved over the last decade to mean both a specific strategy for visualizing and analyzing data and an umbrella term for a processing paradigm. The resulting confusion makes it difficult for visualization and analysis scientists to communicate with each other and with their stakeholders. To address this problem, a group of over 50 experts convened with the goal of standardizing terminology. This paper summarizes their findings and proposes a new terminology for describing in situ systems. An important finding from this group was that in situ systems are best described via multiple, distinct axes: integration type, proximity, access, division of execution, operation controls, and output type. This paper discusses these axes, evaluates existing systems within the axes, and explores how currently used terms relate to the axes.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
